“CARES IV” Stimulus and Relief – Status and Outlook on July 24, 2020 9:34 a.m. EDT – Subject to Immediate Change.

The humorist and political wit Will Rogers is credited with this comment: “I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat.” As we go to press with this missive at 9:34 a.m. EDT, July 24, 2020, the comment would appear to be better phrased if the last word were “Republican.” Of course, things in Washington can change fast.

Almost everyone in Washington is in agreement that the Federal government will need to provide additional stimulus and relief to a number of constituencies. Some observers refer to the next package as “CARES IV.” Rest assured, the new law will have its very own tortured acronym.

Most pressing is the fact that the $600 per week Federal unemployment supplemental payments end July 31, 2020. About 30 million Americans are collecting jobless benefits. That $600 per week has been a critical lifeline to many of those people and their families.

The $600 per week supplemental payments cause unemployment benefits in many cases to be larger than workers’ compensation for employment. There is anecdotal evidence that such large unemployment payments discourage workers from seeking employment. Some conservative activists and economists seize on that argument. More progressive economists dispute the argument and offer recent analyses that no evidence exists that the extra benefits have been discouraging people from returning to work. The progressives say that it is the lack of jobs, not the extra benefits, holding workers back.

Congressional Democrats want to continue the $600 per week payments. The Trump administration has proposed that unemployed workers would receive 70 percent of their previous salary in combined state and Federal benefits. The New York Times says the administration proposal works out to about $200 per week in Federal supplements for a typical worker. So, there you have the opening bids on a program that needs to be renewed in a week in some form. (By the way, I am trying to find takers at my office on my bet that the government’s computers cannot be programmed within any semblance of a reasonable time frame to dispense monthly checks that vary based on combinations of (a) 30 million different salaries and (b) 50 + state unemployment compensation programs. Officemates’ responses so far? Crickets.)

In May, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives passed a $3.5 trillion stimulus package dubbed the HEROES Act. This bill expanded stimulus and relief to many sectors of the economy. The House promptly sent the HEROES Act to the Senate, where it has gathered dust for two months. The HEROES Act remains the stimulus and relief package that the House Democrats support. It is their opening bid in imminent negotiations . Key aspects of the HEROES Act include:

• Significant state and local government assistance
• Compensation and protection for front line workers
• Funds for vaccine and antibody development and testing
• Expanded social safety net benefits
• Housing assistance
• Funds for election safety

At the beginning of this week, the Republican response to the HEROES Act was foggy, if not downright murky. Senate Republicans argued publicly amongst themselves about what stimuli should be continued in what form and to what degree. In significant part, Republican Senators disagreed with the administration about how to move forward with stimulus and relief, particularly with President Trump’s proposal to cut Social Security payroll taxes.

On Thursday, July 23, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell unveiled bullet points of a $1 trillion relief package, with details to be drafted ASAP. Highlights of the Senate Republican skeletal proposal:

• No Trump Social Security payroll tax cut (agreed with the White House)
• Liability protection for businesses, schools and health care providers (McConnell’s “red line”)
• Funding for schools, state and local government, healthcare
• Federal unemployment benefits not as generous as those now in place
• Another round of stimulus checks
• Another round of PPP loans, with tighter restrictions on borrowers
• Direct assistance to hardest hit industries

I mentioned that Federal supplemental unemployment benefits ends July 31, didn’t I? Oh, did I tell you that Congress is scheduled to recess on August 8 for the rest of the month? Based on these critical dates and the current impasses, I predict with some trepidation that the existing $600 supplemental payments will be extended for a short period of time as the Republicans put pen to paper, so that the parties can bargain hard upon their return to Washington after the August recess. Then, they will need to stopgap the supplemental payments and some other programs before they go into full-time campaign mode for the November elections.

There were other COVID-19 stimulus and relief developments this week. We’ll discuss those next week.

VKM

For more information check out HM&M’s COVID-19 Resources page.

Related Posts

Tax Reform Hot Topic: Meals and Entertainment

Question: Are Business-Related Meals and Entertainment Still Deductible? Answer: Fifty percent of all costs of reasonable business-related meals are deductible. Some exceptions exist. Except for limited situations and categories of expenses, entertainment costs are not deductible. After reviewing early ...

January 25, 2018 read more...

Relief from Filing: Texas Franchise Report and TWC Report

Texas Franchise The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts announced that the office will be automatically extending the due date for 2020 Texas franchise tax reports to July 15, 2020, to be consistent with the Internal ...

April 5, 2020 read more...

New Partnership Audit Rules May Require Action Soon by Partnerships and Partners

Absent an election by a partnership to apply earlier, for years beginning after December 31, 2017, new rules will govern IRS audits of partnerships.  Among other changes, the new law allows the Internal Revenue Service ...

September 12, 2017 read more...

U.S. Treasury Proposes Regulations That Would Eliminate Most Valuation Discounts for Intra-Family Transfers of Interests in Family-Controlled Entities

On August 2, 2016, the U.S. Treasury issued long-awaited proposed regulations under Section 2704 of the Internal Revenue Code that will, for the most part, eliminate valuation discounts for lack of control, lack of marketability, ...

August 30, 2016 read more...